Philippines Considers UN Anti Corruption Treaty to Pursue Extradition of Zaldy Co
The Philippine government is exploring the possibility of using an international anti corruption framework to locate and extradite former lawmaker Zaldy Co, who is accused of playing a central role in a multibillion peso flood control scandal and is believed to be hiding overseas. Officials say the move reflects Manila’s determination to hold high level figures accountable for alleged corruption involving public funds.
Presidential press officer and undersecretary Claire Castro confirmed that authorities are studying a proposal to invoke the United Nations Convention Against Corruption as a legal pathway to pursue Co. The idea was put forward by Senator Panfilo Lacson, who has been vocal about the need to use all available international mechanisms to track down suspects accused of large scale graft.
Zaldy Co, a former congressman, faces multiple charges related to corruption and malversation of public funds. Prosecutors allege that billions of pesos intended for flood control and infrastructure projects were misappropriated through inflated contracts and irregular project implementation. The scandal has fueled public anger, particularly in areas that remain vulnerable to flooding despite massive government spending over the years.
Authorities believe Co may have fled the country to avoid prosecution and is suspected to be in Portugal. However, his exact whereabouts have not been confirmed. This uncertainty has complicated efforts to bring him back to face trial, prompting officials to look beyond traditional extradition channels.
The UN Convention Against Corruption, to which the Philippines is a signatory, provides a framework for international cooperation in cases involving corruption. It includes provisions on mutual legal assistance, asset recovery, and extradition. Government officials say tapping the treaty could help Philippine authorities work more closely with foreign governments to locate Co and potentially secure his return.
Castro said the government is carefully reviewing the legal and diplomatic requirements involved, noting that extradition cases are often complex and depend on cooperation from the country where the suspect is believed to be residing. She added that using UNCAC would demonstrate the administration’s commitment to fighting corruption at all levels, regardless of how powerful or well connected the individuals involved may be.
Senator Lacson has argued that extraordinary cases involving massive public losses require equally robust responses. He has urged authorities not to allow legal technicalities or jurisdictional hurdles to derail accountability. According to Lacson, invoking international agreements sends a strong message that the Philippines will pursue corruption cases beyond its borders.
Legal experts caution that while UNCAC can facilitate cooperation, it does not automatically guarantee extradition. Each case still depends on domestic laws, bilateral agreements, and the willingness of foreign authorities to act. Portugal, for example, has its own legal standards for extradition that must be satisfied.
Despite these challenges, anti corruption advocates say the move is an important step. They argue that allowing alleged masterminds of large scale corruption to evade justice undermines public trust and weakens deterrence. For communities affected by failed flood control projects, the case is also deeply personal, symbolizing broken promises and misplaced priorities.
As investigations continue, the government says it remains committed to exhausting all legal avenues to bring suspects to justice. Whether through international treaties or diplomatic engagement, officials insist that accountability for corruption will remain a top priority.
